Puget Sound Liberals Weekly Newsletter #182

Enhancing Freedom, Opportunity and Cooperation in Puget Sound and Beyond

Through informing and networking Liberals and Liberal Organizations.

 

Our vision is hundreds of thousands of well-informed Puget Sound Liberals working together.

 

          3000 members                                 July 10, 2009                   formerly Lake Hills Liberals                

 

 

 

 

                                                     

Our Website                                   Our  Editor                  To Unsubscribe

 

              Table of Contents   *Featured Articles

 

About Puget Sound Liberals

Calendars of Events

Communication with Our Members --

Opportunities

Petitions

 

Commentaries from Our Members

Helen Montgomery: Iran Election Results May Be Fraudulent

Dean Baker: Housing Bubble Caused Economic Crisis

Dean Baker: Most Stimulus Has Already Occurred*

Rich Austin: ILWA Supports Single Payer Health Care

Rich Austin: A Health Care Poll with the Right Questions

Linda Redman: We Need Healthy, Peaceful, Ecological Cultural Settlements

 

Liberals and Democrats Links to the Beef

Government Watch

Making Sausage: Pork and Compromises*

 

State and Local Links to the Beef

David Spring: Higher Education Will Cost More*

 

Nation and World Links to the Beef

Which Wars Are Justified?*

What’s NATO Now For?

 

Our Liberal Spirit

Fear versus Hope*

 

Recommended Books

 

 

 

Our Political Values

 

Our Political Priorities

 

·       Fair Clean Elections and Open Government

·       Fair Taxes and Competent Spending

·       Investment for Productivity

·       Quality Health, Education, Jobs, Income

·       Environmental Protection and Energy Independence

·       Security and Equal Rights

·       Justice and Peace Everywhere

·       International Cooperation and Leadership

 

Conservatives oppose all of these

 

     Let’s End Our National Nightmare

 

         Let’s Restore Our American Dream

 

More on Conservative opposition to our American Dream

 

Washington State’s 5 Major Needs

·       Federal Funding for Health and Education

·       Stop Corporate Abuse

·       Public Campaign Financing

·       Substitute a Progressive Income Tax

·       Replacing Conservative Legislators

 

Quote of the Week

The world is not respectable; it is mortal, tormented, confused, deluded forever; but it is shot through with beauty, with love, with glints of courage and laughter; and in these, the spirit blooms timidly, and struggles to the light amid the thorns.  George Santayana (1863-1952)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Calendar of Events

Thursday, July 30 at 7 PM at Issaquah Public Library (10 West Sunset Way, Issaquah) – 5th Legislative District Democrats Speaker Series hosts Seattle Port Commissioner Gael Tarleton, discussing issues which the Port is addressing.

Monday, August 10 at 6 PM to Wednesday, August 12 at 12:30 PM at Seattle University –National Vacations Matter Summit, with more than 500 experts from the fields of health, travel and tourism, family studies and the environment.  $50 ($25 students).  To Register.  $120-180 for room for both nights, meals, and parking Register for accommodations and meals by July 20.  Sponsored by Take Back Your Time.  Full information at: right2vacation.org

 

 

Calendars of Events                             

 

King County Democrats - LD Meetings            Some 2008 Legislature Lobby Days

Thurston County Progressive Net                  Western Washington Fellowship of Reconciliation

Alliance for Democracy                                Democratic Underground.Com                          

Sierra Club Cascade Chapter Calendar           Cool State Washington

Washington Public Campaigns Calendar          Town Hall Seattle Calendar

Washington State Labor Council                    Whatcom County Peace and Justice Calendar 

Conversation Cafe      Drinking Liberally          Seattle NOW          

Wallingford Neighbors for Peace and Justice – Friday Night Movies      Liberal films on PBS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Communication with Our Members

 

This issue contains a lengthy commentary by David Spring, concerning higher education costs.  I would like to include more such descriptive and explanatory commentaries with necessary evidence.  Dave Thomas

 

Opportunities

Useful Websites: contacts, maps, community organizing tools, and more.

Access to jillions of political cartoons.

Download Sightline Institute’s climate policy primer ‘Cap and Trade 101’.  About Sightline.

Create your own petition.

Conduct your own home energy audit.

See all of President Obama’s weekly (Saturday) addresses.

Open Congress: Race Tracker

Find opportunities for volunteering or register your own opportunity for others.

 

Petitions

Welcome Al Franken and thank him for co-sponsoring the Employee Free Choice Act.

Lend your name to a TV ad to persuade senators to support a public health insurance option.

Ask your senators where they stand on a public health insurance option.

Tell your congress members we need health care reform now, including a public insurance option.

Tell your senators to support adequate funding for natural resources in our Interior and Environmental agencies appropriations bills.

Tell EPA to only support biofuels which reduce consumption of fossil fuels.

Tell Secretary of Interior Ken Salazar to strengthen the Endangered Species Law.

Tell Chief of the Forest Service Thomas Tidwell to protect Yellowstone buffalo.

Tell your senators to support President Obama’s new treaty to reduce nuclear arms.

Tell your representative to appropriate money to fully fund our United Nations obligations.

 

 

 

 

 

Commentaries From Our Members

 

Helen Montgomery: The Reported Iran Election Results May Be Fraudulent

 

I read the post about the Iran Election which had a link to an article by Mark Weisbot in Newsweek: he said the election is NOT fraudulent. Here is a reply post from a reader (Shiveh) that I think is worth considering:

 

I am puzzled! You mention “The government has agreed to post the individual ballot box totals on the web. This would provide another opportunity for any of the hundreds of thousands of witnesses to the precinct-level vote count to say that they witnessed a different count, if any did so.” Knowing that results are computerized and it takes only a few mouse clicks to publish them on the government’s web site, why do you have us believe that a promise is sufficient in this case? The whole logic of your argument is based on the fact that there are many thousands of small vote counts and each count is known by a small group of people. Then although you acknowledge that all of these small vote counts go to a central location in the Interior ministry and the sums are tabulated by a small group of Ahmadinejad appointees, you accept their final numbers along with their promise to post how they reached that summation! Why didn’t you wait to see the actual list of ballet box totals before you put all your credibility behind this affirmation? How long does it take to push those mouse buttons?

 

You also mentioned that “The only independent poll we have, from the New America Foundation and conducted three weeks before the election, predicts the result that occurred.” I’m sure you have read that poll results. They are very interesting and I’m sure an informed academic like you can reach plausible conclusions from them.

 

The poll was taken before Guardian council released the names of the four candidates that people could vote for. Hence, at the time we had Ahmadinejad on one side and bunch of so called moderates wanting to oppose him on the other side. This by itself should tell you that the entire conservative pro establishment vote was going to Ahmadinejad but people who wouldn’t vote for him had various people in mind. Also, you are aware that the polling was administered by telephone from outside Iran. Your interest in the Iranian affairs suggests that you are somewhat familiar with the amount of government interference in people’s day to day life there. At least you should know that there are some percentages of Iranians that believe government eavesdrops on their phone conversations especially when the call originates from outside the country. Many among this group will not tell a stranger on the phone who they’ll vote for if the one they plan to vote for is someone other than Ahmadinejad. Some may even tell you what they think the eavesdropper on the phone likes to hear.

 

The poll you mention puts Ahmadinejad at 34% approval rating among the respondents. If you believe the poll is credible and a good sample of how people voted, shouldn’t you put Ahmadinejad’s numbers

in the final vote tally somewhere between 20%-34%? What does a number above 60% tells you?  Helen Montgomery

 

Dean Baker: Our Economic Crisis Started with a Housing Bubble

 

Dean Baker: Most Stimulus Has Already Occurred

 

Read Joe Biden’s understanding of the effects of our stimulus package.

 

Rich Austin: ILWA Supports Single Payer Health Care

 

A resolution endorsing the United States Health Care Act (HR 676) was unanimously adopted by delegates to the June 8 - 12 convention of the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU), held in Seattle. Please note the reference to a "public option". 

 

It is my opinion that support for a blank check public option is more or less a retreat from what is truly needed.  I know there are all kinds of feel good clichés, like "a bird in the hand...." or, "don't sacrifice the good in pursuit of the perfect"....but neither apply to the "public option" debate.  Why would anyone trust Congress to write decent health care reform language?  Decades of evidence to the contrary demonstrate that they are "not up to the task" (which is another way of saying most have been bought off and/or are ideologically-challenged).  With HR 676, all the ‘i's have been dotted, and all the ‘t's have been crossed.  There is no good reason to reinvent the wheel.  Nationwide there is overwhelming support for single payer.  Doesn't the very definition of "democracy" demand that Congress act accordingly?  Why settle for less than democracy?  (Lord knows we the people have been settling for much less.  It was a rallying cry when Bush was in the White House.  Now that Democrats are in control is it suddenly ok?)

 

Politicians who refuse to represent the people on this life and death issue should suffer ballot box revenge!

 

Folks/organizations are urged to copy, personalize, and pass the resolution adopted by the ILWU, and then send them to their Members of Congress. That, my friends, is one example of grass roots, rank and file democracy!

 

In unity and solidarity, Rich Austin – President. Pacific Coast Pensioners Association – ILWU

 

Rich Austin: A Health Care Poll with the Right Questions

 

When it comes to “health care reform” there are polls, pollsters, statistics, disinformation, spin doctors and snake oil salesmen.  Isn’t it time for a poll that asks the right question?  Here’s an example:

 

Are you in favor of a national health care insurance plan that would?

·       cover all medically necessary care including in-patient, out-patient, prescription drugs, vision, dental, hearing, long term care, durable equipment, mental health, and nursing home care for every resident of our nation

·       cost just 4.75% of household income for the entire family (as an example, a family of four with annual earnings of $55,000 would pay just $2615.50 per year,  $217.71 per month)

·       prohibit deductibles and co-payments

·       pay all bills from a national heath insurance trust fund; you would never be billed

·       guarantee your choice of doctors, hospitals, and other providers, anywhere, anytime

·       leave decisions for appropriate care up to you and your doctors

·       not require increased taxation

_____ YES  _____ NO

 

Rich Austin

 

Linda Redman: We Need Health, Peaceful, Ecological Cultural Settlements

 

Greetings Dave, I don't know if we've ever met, but current work is trying to raise two children mostly by myself.  During this endeavor, I am noticing MANY families that are raising children along the lines of patriarchy and biblical teachings.  I have found Buddhism most helpful as a life philosophy for me and desire to feed my children healthy food (non-GMO; mostly plant; organic).  I am scrambling right now for how to do that and give my kids some attention and useful environment. 

I feel like moving to France!

In your work in the progressive movement please work to make structures that move us towards healthy, peaceful, ecological cultural settlements. People like me need kibbutz-style communities & eco-villages with virtuous people teaching sustainable, sensible lifestyles for our children.  I hope we can have economic incentives, laws and common visions to steer us there.  Anyway, thanks for the work you are doing to further useful progressive ideals.  Peace, Linda Redman, my website

 

 

Liberals and Democrats

 

Government Watch

Also go to Whitehouse.gov.

 

Issues Emphasized by Obama Administration

These include: Agriculture & Rural, Arts, Child Advocacy, Civil and Gay Rights, Defense, Disabilities, Economy, Education, Energy & Environment, Ethics, Faith, Family, Fiscal Responsibility, Foreign Policy. Health Care, Homeland Security, Immigration, Katrina, Poverty Seniors, Social Security & Pensions, Service, Science, Sportsmen, Taxes. Technology, Transportation, Urban Policy, Veterans and Women. 

 

Why Sportsmen without Sportswomen?  Why Women without Men?  What about Consumer Protection, Gun Regulation, Investor Protection, Labor, Manufacturing, Marijuana, Public Campaign Finance and Regulation of Corporate Lobbying, Quality Jobs, Trade Policy and Worker Safety?  Many of the issues are described with insufficient detail to know what will be addressed, such as military base closures and elimination of other military expenditures.  I also notice that the Change at a Glance chart has not been updated since April.  If I was in charge of Whitehouse.gov, it would be much more informative.  Dave Thomas

 

What issues do you think should be added or addressed in more detail?

 

Economic Stimulus

Dean Baker recommends government grant tax credits to businesses which give employees more time off (paid family leave, sick leave, vacations and shorter work weeks).  If employees worked 5% fewer hours, 7 million addition employees would be needed. 

 

I have long believed that asking employees to provide more time off with out being paid for it is an unfair unfunded mandate.  I also believe that Democrats should be sensitive and responsive to the needs of small businesses.  We can do much more for them than can Republicans, including provision of publicly financed health care and tax shifting from our FICA jobs tax to another tax, probably a VAT.  Dave Thomas

 

Our commercial media appear to be increasingly skeptical of the efficacy of the stimulus-investment package.  More attention is being given to Republican opinion, which only promotes the same supply side trickle down approach which contributed to our economic collapse, federal deficits and debt.  Our 2010 budget will provide additional stimulus.  If these are insufficient, the solution is to pass another Stimulus Investment Package, although it will be more difficult to get needed public and congressional support.  For more.  For more.  For more.  For more.

 

Health Care

President Obama defended including a public health insurance option instead of immediately shifting to a single payer public health insurance system.  It is necessary to avoid disrupting the many people who are happy with their present employer paid private health insurance.  Howard Dean’s new book presents comprehensive argument for needed public health insurance option.

 

New budget analysis is favorable to Senate HELP subcommittee health reform plan.  Senate votes are there for health reform with a robust public option.  We now have a five week sprint to passing public health reform.  Pharmaceutical companies and hospitals have offered cheaper prices.  Why? 

 

I am still optimistic that our congress will pass health care reform, climate reform, and financial regulatory reform this year, clearing the way for addressing other issues and confronting wealthy and powerful special interests.  Dave Thomas

 

Nuclear Arms Reduction

In Russia, President Obama and President Dmitri Medvedev agreed to cooperate to reduce their nuclear arms.  At the G-8 summit, emphasis was placed upon arms control, disarmament, non-proliferation and nuclear weapons security.

 

I believe we should be able to cooperate extensively with most countries, except those which insist upon abusing their own and other peoples.  In particular, I believe that Russian and our United States should be able to resolve most of our differences.  The same for Iran and our United States.  And China and our United States.  The major exceptions concern human rights.

 

Military Pork

House Armed Services Committee members defend pork not wanted by Defense Department.

 

Foreign Policy

Pope Paul may be broadly supportive of president Obama’s peace initiatives.

 

Joe Biden says Israel is entitled to attack Iran.  For more.  Is that Obama Administration policy or just Joe Biden’s undisciplined mouth?

 

Making Sausage: Pork and Compromises

 

Passage of the American Clean Energy and Security Act (ACES) by our house of representatives is an example of making sausage.  Having various different effects on different congressional districts, their representatives were highly motivated to mitigate negative costs that businesses and consumers in their districts would incur.  The result was many hundreds of pages detailing various subsidies and exemptions.  The result will still produce reductions in green house gases, but many of these will be delayed.

 

It may be that health reform will also variously affect different congressional districts, in which case we can expect some of the same sausage making pork and compromises.  One of the signs of this sausage making is a lengthy bill, containing many detailed qualifications of each aspect of the legislation, often such that the final bill is produced so late, that congress members can only be aware of the big picture and the specific parts that affect their constituents.

 

Here’s the Beef

Conservatives don’t know how to respond to the fact that American historic values are Liberal values.

More evidence of a bleak future for Republicans.

Sarah Palin Resigns Governorship.

Several Republican Senators may support global warming bill.

Financial companies may be divided in their opposition to various regulations.

 

State and Local

 

Higher Education: Washington’s Working Families will be Paying Much More

David Spring, M. Ed. wildernessspring@aol.com June 29, 2009 [1]

 

As a direct result of the 2009 legislature’s budget cuts, in May 2009, the Washington State University Board of Regents voted to increase tuition for WSU undergraduates. It will now cost $870 more in the 2009-2010 academic year, for a total of $7,088 per year. The cost will rise to $8,080 the following year — a compound increase of nearly 30 percent over two years. There will be parallel increases at the University of Washington and other Higher Ed institutions in our State during the next two years.

So this report is not just about

Washington State University,              Washington State Taxes: National Rank

but about the state of Higher

Education in Washington State. 

 

As with the problem in K12 funding,    the dramatic drop in State support for Higher Education is associated with the dramatic plunge in State revenue resulting from the 1997 Intangible Tax Break for millionaires.

 

In 1996, Washington State was 12th in the nation in State income and in State taxes as a percent of income. However, by 2005, even though our State income was still 16th in the nation, our State revenue, as a percent of income, fell over 20% to 37th in the nation. [2] 

 

As a result of this massive tax break     Percent of Income Paid in State and Local Taxes [3]

for millionaires, as well as over-reliance          

on sales taxes, the State of Washington

has the most unfair tax structure in America The richest 1% pay 3%

of their income in State taxes while

our middle class pays more than 10%.

Those who can afford to pay             

the most pay the least, while those who can afford to pay the least pay the most. Our middle class pays some of the highest State taxes in America, even though we have some of the lowest funded schools in America.

If millionaires in our State paid State taxes at the national average, it would generate several billion dollars a year. This would not harm millionaires as they could deduct their State taxes from their federal taxes. But this additional revenue would be enough to restore K12 school funding in our State to the national average, and restore funding for other important State programs such as Higher Education and health care for low income children.

 

As a direct result of massive tax breaks for millionaires, and the resulting plunge in State revenue, State support for our Universities has also plunged dramatically. As recent as 1996, State support was 67% of total Higher Ed costs.

Washington State % support for Higher Ed

In 2004, for the first time in our history, State support for Higher

Education fell to less than 50%.

It is currently at 40%. The 2009

legislature reduced State

support to less than 20% of the total cost by 2010.

      

Currently, our State spends about

10% less than the national average  supporting Higher Education. [4] This is similar to our lack of support of K12 funding which is also about 10% below the national average.

 

In a little over 10 years, tuition                       WSU Tuition Increases: 1995 to 2010 [5]

at WSU has more than doubled,

from $3,000 in 1995 to more

than $6,000 per year by 2008.

The 2009 legislature has now

further increased tuition so

that by 2010, it will be

over $8,000 per year.

This means that working

class families, already struggling

to make their mortgage payments,

will be forced to spend an

extra $5,000 per year over

1995 levels if they want their child to attend WSU. 

 

Our State is already near the bottom of the nation in the percent of 9th Graders who go on to complete college. Many blame this problem on low WASL scores or inadequate High School course requirements. But this report raises another possibility. Namely, that our State’s abandonment of financial support for Higher Education has put the cost of higher education out of reach for many, if not most, working class families. Sacrificing the future of our children as well as the vitality of our economy is a heavy price to pay just to preserve tax breaks for millionaires. 

Ironically, when the $3 billion in federal stimulus money is gone, this situation will only get worse.

The solution to this problem is not to further increase taxes on our middle class, or to further cut funding for Higher Education, but to move towards a fairer tax structure so we can have fairer national average school funding and national average support for Higher Education. 

We need a tax fairness reform package passed in the 2010 legislative session to restore national average K12 and Higher Ed funding and to preserve the future of our State. A good first step would be to close the 1997 tax loophole exempting intangible property from our State property tax.

 

The hidden problem: A Decade of skyrocketing tax breaks for millionaires

When the Intangibles Loophole was created in 1997, it was claimed that it would have very little effect on total State taxes. The chart above clearly shows that this claim was wrong. This tax loophole gave billions of dollars in tax breaks to our richest citizens during the past 12 years. It is no mere coincidence that our State has been shorting our public schools  as well as our colleges and Universities by billions of dollars a year ever since. This tax loophole also caused many commercial business to change the designation of their tangible property to “intangible” property in order to avoid paying the State property tax. The total shift in commercial property from tangible to intangible commercial property has exceeded over $100 billion in commercial property exempted from State property taxes. This is currently costing our State another billion dollars in lost revenue each year. The Intangible tax exemption now costs our State a total of $10 billion dollars a year. [6]  This is much more than our State spends on school funding or Higher Education each year.

Tax exemptions for millionaires and major corporations have become so popular that there are now more than 567 tax exemptions totaling over $50 billion dollars a year. This “invisible budget” is now much bigger than the entire visible State budget (which is currently $16 billion per year or $32 billion per biennium). Our current public school budget is about $7 billion dollars per year. This means that for every dollar we spend on public schools for our children, we spend $7 on tax breaks for millionaires.

 

The claim of “Out of Control” State spending is simply a dishonest campaign slogan.

It is a myth fabricated by the radical right to deceive the voters. While State revenue and spending have grown about 50%, personal income in our State has grown by more than 50% (I know your income did not go up, but the income of millionaires doubled in the past 10 years, and the State population increased greatly and inflation took a toll, so the total income divided by everyone has grown more than 50%). Thus, the State budget as a percent of personal income has actually fallen since 1997.

                           

 Ten Years of Rapidly Rising Tax Breaks for Millionaires

                       Annual State Budget compared to Tax Exemptions [7] (to nearest Billion)

                         

 

But in the same ten years, tax breaks for millionaires have skyrocketed 250% (see chart). Tax breaks in the past ten years have increased at a rate which is 5 times greater than the increase in the State budget.

 

The reason our State budget has risen at a rate of a half billion per year for the past 10 years is to pay for a rising population, rising energy costs and rising health care costs of an aging population (also paying for skyrocketing health care profits of un-regulated HMO’s). When adjustments are made for these factors, State spending has actually taken a dramatic drop in the past 10 years. Meanwhile, tax breaks for millionaires are skyrocketing at a rate of $3 billion dollars per year. Given the dire consequences of the 2009 budget cuts and the likelihood of even greater budget cuts in 2010, there is no rational reason to continue this massive tax give away.

 

Why is it that the corporate controlled media is not reporting this rapid rise in tax giveaways? Perhaps it is because they are among the privileged few getting these massive tax breaks. The number of tax breaks has risen from 420 in 1998 to 576 in 2008 (an increase of 150 tax breaks in 10 years or 15 new tax breaks every year). Where we used to give away $20 billion a year in tax breaks (twice the total State budget back then), we now give away $50 billion a year in tax breaks (three times the size of our entire State budget). [8]

 

Our annual State budget for 2010 is $16 billion dollars of which $7 billion is spent on public schools. But we are also spending $50 billion dollars in 2010 on tax breaks for millionaires. For every dollar we invest in public schools, we give away $7 in tax breaks for millionaires!!!

We do not have an “out of control” State spending problem... We have an  “out of control” tax breaks for millionaires problem.

 

These ever-increasing “tax shifts” of the tax burden away from millionaires and onto our middle class have led to increases in middle class taxes. In particular, the property tax burden on our middle class has skyrocketed in the past ten years as the ratio of commercial to residential tangible property has shifted from about 50-50 in 1997 to 66% residential to 33% commercial by 2006. When $100 billion dollars of commercial property is exempted from property taxes, residential property taxes must go up even if State and local spending remains the same.

 

As a consequence of these tax break for millionaires, and tax shifts to our middle class, our middle class now pay much more than the national average in State taxes while millionaires in our State pay much less than the national average. Working families see their tax bills go through the roof and they naturally assume that State spending is “Out of control.” But what is really out of control is tax breaks for millionaires.

 

Adding insult to injury: 2009 legislature grants huge tuition breaks to the super rich!

While the legislature cut funding and spaces for students at our Universities for in-state students, it granted hundreds of millions of dollars in new expanded Higher Ed subsidies for thousands of high income out-of country professionals working at Microsoft. Thus, thousands of middle class Instate students will be forced to spend hundreds of millions of dollars more on their education while thousands of out-of country professionals with high paying jobs will be see their Higher Ed cost cut in have by being allowed to pay in-state tuition rather than out-of state tuition. This huge subsidy for foreign millionaires was made possible by House Bill 1487 sponsored by Ross Hunter and Glenn Anderson. So not only is Microsoft being given hundreds of millions of dollars in State tax breaks for shipping our jobs overseas, but we are now going to allow them to outsource our State Universities to rob our children of a reasonable education.

 

A state resident who is a full-time undergraduate at UW will pay $8,000 in tuition, books and fees next year, compared with $24,000 for a full-time nonresident student.

Just ten years ago, the in-state student was paying one $4,000. So, our kids tuition bills are being more than doubled so the tuition bills of rich foreign nationals can be cut more than half.

 

Rep. Bob Hasegawa, D-Seattle, opposed the measure, calling it unfair to resident students at a time when the state is making it more difficult for everyone to afford to go to school in the state. "It's a diversion of limited resources," Hasegawa said. "We only allow X amount of slots for resident tuition rates and we are displacing those residents with H-1B visa holders, their families and dependents. Microsoft can well afford out-of-state tuition for its people."

 

Each year, the U.S. government issues at least 85,000 H-1B visas to foreign professional workers who have at least a four-year degree. Congress created the H-1B visa program so an employer could hire a foreign guest-worker without having to prove that a qualified American worker could not be found. However, the H-1B visa program is plagued with fraud and abuse and is now a vehicle for outsourcing that deprives qualified American workers of their jobs. Under current law, an outsourcing company can use American workers to train H-1B guest-workers, fire the American workers and outsource the H-1B workers to a foreign country where they will do the same job for a much lower wage. There are over 10,000 H1B holders in our State, with more than half working for Microsoft. [9] This change in policy will create a flood of new foreign applicants at Washington State corporations and State colleges.

 

In summary, the 2009 legislature: Cut UW's budget by 29%.

Offset this cut by authorizing a 30% increase in tuition for in-state students.
Followed this by giving more than a 50% tuition reduction to a small number of individuals (by moving them from the non-resident to the resident tuition rate). - The individuals who are benefiting from this new subsidy, unlike most students, are in well-compensated professional occupations, and many of them are already receiving tuition reimbursement from their employers. Microsoft, for example, offers $7500/year tuition reimbursement.

If a corporation wants foreign workers to gain this type of benefit then they should reimburse educational cost rather than expect the tax payer to carry this burden. When legislators are axing programs for U.S. citizens to balance budgets, offering additional benefits to highly paid foreigners is unconscionable.

 

How much does this new tax break for millionaires cost us?

Assuming that each of the 10,000 out-of-country professionals has one family member attending school here, and assuming there is no increase in out-of-country workers as a result of this bill (a bad assumption given that the whole reason to pass this bill was to as a recruiting benefit to bring in more out-of country workers),

The initial cost of this bill is: 10,000 out –of country students times $16,000 revenue lost per student = $160 Million dollars per year. If the program succeeds in attracting more out-of-country workers to displace in-state employees working at Microsoft, the cost could easily double to more than $300 million dollars per year.

 

Outsourcing the University of Washington

The University of Washington is already turning down 20% of In-state freshman applicants due to lack of space. These are high GPA good students with a laundry list of notable achievements. Meanwhile, UW foreign applications are up 40% from last year. The number of international freshmen who have confirmed at WSU is up 80 percent. According to UW the increase is “due to the cheap U.S. dollar and increased demand from places like India and China”. We should admit some foreign students, but not at the exclusion of students from our own State. Microsoft complains that they hire foreigners because there is not enough talent in America to fit their needs. Well, how can our kids compete when they are excluded from college entry in preference to foreigners?

 

Who voted for such an unfair shifting in taxes from Microsoft millionaires to middle class kids?

The bill was sponsored by Ross Hunter, Glenn Anderson, Deb Eddy, Lynn Kessler and Deb Wallace in the State House of Representatives. It passed in the House 59 to 38, but there was no way of knowing who voted for it because a roll call vote was never taken.  It was publicly opposed by Representatives Hasegawa, Driscoll, Hope, Cox and Rolfes.

 

In the Senate, those who voted for it included: Senators Berkey, Brandland, Delvin, Eide, Fairley, Franklin, Fraser, Hargrove, Hatfield, Haugen, Hobbs, Jacobsen, Jarrett, Keiser, Kilmer, Kline, Kohl-Welles, Marr, McAuliffe, McDermott, Murray, Oemig, Prentice, Pridemore, Ranker, Regala, Schoesler, Sheldon, Shin, Tom, and Zarelli.

 

It is likely that many legislators were misled about the harm this bill will inflict on our middle class children. But clearly, middle class families need to re-examine who we are sending to the State legislature if our kids are to have a fair chance at competing in public schools and succeeding in college and beyond.  David Spring

 

See commentary by Ann Daley, Executive Director, Washington Higher Education Coordinating Board.

 

Three methods of assessing the costs of educating a graduate (catalog cost, transcript cost, and full cost) yield different results relevant to different purposes.  Besides producing graduates, colleges also produce education for those who don’t graduate, research and various community services.

 

Dr. Michael Kirst’s commentary on Jane Wellman’s Delta Project Report includes:

“Between 2002 and 2006, average tuition at public research universities increased by nearly 27 percent or $1,419, but the spending on each student only went up by 1 percent, or $149. In calculating “education and related” spending -- the dollars spent directly on students -- the Delta Project included expenses on instruction and student services. Also included in that figure is the per-student share of administrative functions tied to academics, academic support and operations and maintenance.   Tuition increases outpaced per-student spending even more dramatically at public master's institutions and community colleges.

 

Private institutions, on the other hand, are charging students more and putting more money into instruction at the same time, according to the report. At private research institutions, for instance, tuition went up by $985, but per-student spending actually rose by $1,453. Whether that spending translated into a higher quality education, however, remains to be seen.

 

So where is all the money going? At most types of institutions, an increasing share of “education and related” spending goes toward administrative support and student services, while instruction -- including faculty salaries -- is falling as a percentage of those expenses. Administrative expenses made up the most significant share of “education and related” expenses at private bachelor’s institutions, where 44.2 percent of the cost of educating students was devoted to administration in 2006, according to the report.”

 

Robert E. Martin comments that higher education costs of private institutions result from decisions by faculty, administrators and board members who are agents pursuing their own interests instead of the interests of students, parents, alumni and donors who pay these costs.

 

In summary, higher education costs are increasing rapidly for private, but little for public institutions.  Public institutions are receiving less revenue from our state and federal government, requiring increased revenue from tuition, which is paid by students and their parents.  Dave Thomas

 

Here’s the Beef

Allowing backyard cottages is an easy way to increase Seattle’s housing density.

Bye bye manicured lawns?

Gleaners save food that would be wasted.  For themselves and their community.

Last year, people in the Pacific Northwest continued the trend to using less gasoline.

Thinning trees to prevent fires reduces carbon stored in wood more than allowing fires.

Prisoners are employed doing research and conservation.

In Oregon, 5000 employers provided 50,000 green jobs in 226 different occupations.

Green renovation of older office buildings renders them more attractive to tenants.

Boeing exports jobs, quality falters, behind schedule, lose orders, thinks of exporting more jobs.

Vancouver, BC plans to promote installation of electric vehicle recharging stations.

Washington Land Commissioner Peter Goldmark requires more information about gravel mining operation’s plans to protect sea grass.

Indians are restoring salmon to Pacific Northwest rivers.

Across the west, pharmacists must provide Plan B morning after contraceptive pills.

 

Nation and World  

 

Which Wars Are Justified?

 

Self Defense

I believe some wars are justified.  A country can defend itself from attack as our United States did in invading Afghanistan in 2001.  Or assistance can be given to another country which has been attacked, as occurred in the first Gulf War authorized by our United Nations in response to Iraq’s 1990 invasion of Kuwait.  But in recent years, very few countries have been attacked.  The risks are greater than any likely rewards.

 

Our United States has frequently attempted to justify its invasions of other countries as a response to some threat.  But this was clearly not the case in Vietnam, Grenada and Panama.  These wars were totally unjustified.  In 1979, the Soviet Union sent military forces to help the Afghan government in a civil war.  This was unjustified, even though the Afghan government was less abusive that were the factions which defeated it.  Similarly, Israel occupied the West Bank in response to being invaded.  But most of Israel’s actions in the West Bank since then are not justified as a constructive response to any remaining threat.  As an alternative, I can imagine that Israel might have turned the West Bank over to United Nations supervision to protect Israel.

 

Stopping Abuses

I believe the following wars, (in which an international force or neighboring country invaded a country to stop enormous abuses of people by their government) were justified:

·       India’s 1871 invasion of East Pakistan (Bangladesh)

·       Tanzania’s 1978 invasion of Uganda   

·       Vietnam’s 1978 invasion of Cambodia  

·       NATO 1995 bombing in Bosnia 1992

·       NATO 1999 bombing of Yugoslavia Kosovo 

 

I believe similar invasions would have been justified earlier in Cambodia, in Rwanda in 1994 and in Darfur in 2003.  Notice that most of these involved ethnic, or regional disputes, Cambodia didn’t. 

 

Justifying these wars is a slippery slope.  Most countries have some abuse.  How much is enough to justify an invasion?  Would invasion of Zimbabwe by South Africa, or invasion of Myanmar by India or China be justified?  Was invasion of Iraq in 2003 to remove Saddam Hussain justified?  Is China abusing minorities in its Tibet and Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Provinces enough that foreign intervention would be justified, if it could be effective?

 

What about situations where a country contains various ethnic groups in conflict?

·       Nigeria (1967-1970)

·       Cyprus (1974)

·       Sri Lanka (1983-2009)

·       Various former Soviet countries have mixtures of natives and Russians.  This has recently led to conflict in parts of Georgia, with Russia intervening.

Where one of the ethnic groups is predominant in a neighboring country, the neighboring country is tempted to intervene.

It quickly becomes apparent that the variety of circumstances precludes any easy generalizations.  My first preference would for international laws, courts and enforcement agencies to decide the resolution of all cases such as the above.  In the absence of such resources, particularly heinous situations can justify action by neighboring states or alliances, if their actions are authorized by the United Nations and they act solely to bring justice and peace.

 

What’s NATO Now For?

 

Our North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) developed to provide it’s European and North American members a mutual defense capability against military threats by the Soviet Union.  With the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, NATO’s purpose has become less clear.  But as a valuable military resources, it has continued, recruited new members, fought to stop Serbian violence in Kosovo, and fought against Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan. 

 

In the future, NATO may become an organization of like-minded Democratic managed capitalist states throughout the world to deal with global issues such as peace, disarmament and international violent crime.  In the long run, if the United Nations becomes more Democratic, NATO could become its military arm.

 

Here’s the Beef

Farmers have a lot at stake concerning global warming.

Bye bye sea grass.

Do we need to spend $100 billion on 800 military bases throughout the world?

 

Our Liberal Spirit

 

Fear versus Hope

 

As George Santayana said, “The world is not respectable; it is mortal, tormented, confused, deluded forever; but it is shot through with beauty, with love, with glints of courage and laughter; and in these, the spirit blooms timidly, and struggles to the light amid the thorns.  I imagine all humans living within the jaws of hope and fear.  Our hope, vision and dreams reach up, while our limitations and fears reach down.  How do we live in such jaws?  How do we reduce the painful pressure?

 

We can attempt to quit hoping, dreaming and forming visions, simply thinking that we are victims of an unfair world which blocks our pursuits.  But it is impossible for humans to quit dreaming.  Instead of accepting our weaknesses, we go through life whining about them.

 

We can attempt to courageously strive harder and smarter to realize our dreams, assuming that we can overcome all limitations.  Instead of being less than human, we can attempt to be more than human.  To be all knowing and all controlling.  But this also doesn’t work.  The limitations often can’t be overcome.  In the end, we die. 

 

We can busily try to dream dreams that seem easy to realize, while avoiding dreams that might be blocked.  As evidence reveals more, we discard some dreams and add others.  We never commit to our dreams.  Often looking for excuses to quit, instead of ways to succeed.  Even though we tentatively try to pursue some dreams, our fears dominate our pursuit.

 

I prefer a fourth approach.  Dream flat out.  Accept the reality of limits flat out.  Increase the pressure of the jaws.  Try hard and smart, knowing that I will frequently fail.  Will frequently get squashed.  Put my emphasis upon being able to resist the pressure.  Being able to quickly recover from both failure and success.  Being able to dream new dreams and accept new limitations.  Continually play the game of being fully human, both dreaming and recognizing limitations.  Recognizing that there is more to human life than avoiding pain.  We can walk the tight rope between being less than human like a cow and being more than human like God.

 

Recommended Books – See our list of books for liberals

Justin Pollard and Howard Reid, 2006, The Rise and Fall of Alexandria, Birthplace of the Modern Mind

 

This book joins Arthur Herman’s 2001 book How the Scots Invented the Modern World, The True Story of How Western Europe’s Poorest Nation Created Our World & Everything in It on our reading list because it also describes a great liberal period in human history.

 

 

 

 

Free Member Advertising

 

Hire Our Lake Hills Neighbors

 

Barbara Rader of Black Widow Web Development created our Puget Sound Liberals Website, to which I (not a technical geek) can easily add, modify and remove files.  Learn more about this unique company, which offers a 50% discount for organizations that promote social justice and environmental stewardship.  Dave Thomas

·       Auto Repair, price varies depending on job (but always fair), Jaime Speicher (AAS Auto Repair Technician) (425-746-2353)

·       Babysitting for infants (occasional evenings and weekends) - $5 per hour- Christy Pacheco- johnpacheco01@yahoo.com  425-653-3565

·       Data Entry- $10 per 12 font, double spaced page- Christy Pacheco (425-653-3565 johnpacheco01@yahoo.com)

·       Debt Elimination Counseling, Seminars and Workshops – price negotiable – Sherry Brandt (206-356-8034, somerev2@comcast.net)

·       Home Repair- prices vary, depending on job- John Pacheco 425-653-3565 johnpacheco01@yahoo.com)

·       Home Repair and Remodeling, Rick Hegdahl (206-227-6280  vikingnw@comcast.net)

·       Housekeeper, price negotiable – Laura Montano (641-5038 ambar_lau@hotmail.com)

·       Life Support Therapies, Astara Burlingame RN. (MD) holistic care, acupuncture hypno therapy, biological medicines (206-370-0356)

·       Private Piano Lessons (students must have a piano), afternoons - Anna Khosrowian (378-7938), price negotiable

·       Psychotherapist, accepts insurance -  Sandy Mathews (462-7889, www.sandramathews.com)



[1] Data for this report was complied primarily from the annual legislative reports of Washington State University. (http://olympia.wsu.edu/News). Additional information was from a May 9, 2009 article in the Seattle Times “WSU approves 30% increase in tuition over 2 years”, as well as supplemental data from the National Center for Education Statistics and annual reports from the Higher Education Finance Report (see higheredinfo.org).

[2] Washington State Department of Revenue http://dor.wa.gov/docs/reports/2008/Compare06/Table3.pdf

[3] Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (2002) Who Pays? A Distributional Analysis of the Tax Systems in All 50 States.

[4] Higher Education Finance 2007 Report, page 45. (higheredinfo.org).

[5] The total student cost is much greater. There are over $1,000 in additional required fees not included in tuition. Books, room and board raise actual cost to over $15,000 per year or $60,000 for a 4 year degree.

[6] See Washington State Department of Revenue 2008 Tax Exemption Report, page 39.

[7] Washington State Office of Financial Management, 10 Year Financial Trends, Schedule 5: Near General Fund. Annual Tax Breaks extrapolated from DOR Tax Exemption Reports: 2000, 2004 & 2008. See also http://leap.leg.wa.gov/leap/Oversight/histongf.pdf

[8] Compiled from the Tax Exemption Reports of the Washington State Department of Revenue, 2000, 2004 and 2008. see http://dor.wa.gov/docs/reports/exemptions

[9] Microsoft, the #1 sponsor of visa workers, sponsored 22,726 H-1b visas and 6,074 green cards since 2001. Foreign workers comprise 1/3 of the Microsoft Puget Sound workforce.
http://www.myvisajobs.com/Visa-Sponsor/Microsoft/356252.htm